In the ever-evolving landscape of feminism, it often feels like we're riding waves—sometimes cresting with progress and understanding, and at other times crashing against the shores of oversimplification and commercialization.
Recently, there's been a palpable sense of regression, a drift away from nuanced, intersectional activism toward a more simplified and marketable version of feminism. But amidst these waves of change, it's crucial to reflect on where we've been, where we're headed, and how we can navigate these shifting tides with grace and resilience.
For instance, the recent buzz surrounding the Oscar nominations for the movie Barbie. What started as a celebration of cinematic success quickly spiraled into a pseudo-feminist debate about recognition and representation. Pseudo-feminism can be described wherein the principles of gender equality are co-opted and distorted to serve commercial interests rather than advancing social progress.
While the nomination of Lily Gladstone as the first Native American woman for best actress should have been a moment of triumph, it was overshadowed by critiques of perceived snubs towards privileged white women—a stark reminder of the tendency to prioritize the experiences of the already privileged over the truly groundbreaking achievements of marginalized individuals.
"These very plastic manufactured women just say what’s comfortable for everyone. It’s feel-good feminism" - Rafia Zakaria (Pakistani-American attorney, feminist, journalist, and author)
This incident mirrors a broader trend in mainstream feminism—a shift away from nuanced discussions about how gender intersects with other forms of oppression, such as race and class, towards a more simplified and commodified version of empowerment. Icons like Taylor Swift, carefully curated to appeal to the masses, are hailed as feminist figures despite their apolitical stance—a testament to the power of marketability over substance in shaping feminist discourse.
But perhaps nowhere is the tension between substance and superficiality more apparent than in the phenomenon of the Stanley cup—a seemingly innocent trend that has sparked heated debates about misogyny.
While there's nothing inherently wrong with women embracing their interests, the fervor surrounding water bottles with straws begs the question: are we prioritizing empowerment or consumerism? It's a reminder that feminism should be about more than just feel-good gestures—it should be about challenging systemic inequalities and dismantling oppressive structures.
"The company’s profit grew over $650 million over three years after executives decided to market their now-famous “Stanley Quencher” cup to women" - MSNBC
To understand this cultural phenomenon let's delve a bit more into the history. Since 2016, the Stanley Quencher has existed and appealed to predominantly blue collared men. The durable and sturdy large tumbler was a staple for outdoorsy men who loved adventures. However, thanks to social media and media frenzy's marketing towards women, since, the Stanley cup has become one of the most popular bottles and mingled with conversations of feminism. How did this all happen?
In 2019 due to poor performance, the Stanley cup was discontinued. However, three women Ashlee LeSueur, Taylor Cannon, and Lindley Hutchinson with a passion for product reviews and love for Stnaley quencher, disappointed, set out to revive their beloved water bottled through their website, The Buy Guide.
Pooling their resources and entrepreneurial spirit, LeSueur, Cannon, and Hutchinson embarked on a mission to convince Stanley to resurrect the Quencher and market it to women—a demographic largely overlooked by the brand. With the help of Lauren Solomon, then a national account manager at Stanley, the women pitched their vision of the Quencher as the perfect accessory for women on the go.
Now, the Stanley Cup represents more than just a hydration trend—it's a statement, a symbol of individuality and self-expression. As LeSueur puts it, "It's what I show to the world every day when I choose to take my water bottle."
In an era dominated by social media trends and influencer culture, the Stanley Cup has transcended its humble origins to become a cultural icon—a testament to the power of women's voices and the impact of consumer-driven activism.
The issue here relates back to Pseudo- feminism. While initially intended to combat misogyny and double standards, this oversimplified mantra inadvertently paved the way for a shallow version of empowerment—one that prioritized individual choice over systemic change. Despite valid critiques of over-consumption, defenders of the Stanley cup trend hastily dismiss any criticism as misogyny, effectively silencing meaningful dialogue.
Yet, amidst the noise and distractions of mainstream feminism, there's reason for hope. The conversations begin by asking the question : how do we navigate these waves of feminism, charting a course towards a more equitable and just future? It starts with centering marginalized voices, amplifying their stories and experiences, and challenging the status quo at every turn. It means resisting the allure of superficial empowerment and embracing the messy, complex realities of intersectionality. And perhaps most importantly, it means recognizing that feminism is not a monolithic entity—it's a diverse and multifaceted movement, constantly evolving and adapting to meet the challenges of our times.
Comments